Lisa Su, CEO of AMD, talks about the poor performance of AMD Ryzen processors under 1080p resolutions and says they are working hard to fix this performance problem.
It must be recognized that the AMD Ryzen processors have arrived to face the Intel processors, but the AMD Ryzen 7 at the moment do not perform as expected and possibly the Ryzen 5, which should arrive during the second quarter of this year, are the ideal for gaming. While this does not come, it is clear that the Ryzen 7 processors on the market (more or less), do not finish performing as they should with 1080p resolutions.
Lisa Su, the CEO of AMD, has said in one of the Reddit talks that they are aware of the problem with their current processors with high-end graphics cards and 1080p resolutions and that they are focusing their efforts on improving this point. AMD is working closely with developers to ensure that improvements are coming and in the shortest possible time to meet the needs and demands of users who are betting on one of the AMD Ryzen processors.
AMD clarifies that this does not happen in all games and also highlights that the processors make use of a new architecture, therefore, developers need some time to become familiar with it and take full advantage of this new architecture. Optimization at this point is very important, because this will allow the Ryzen processors to offer higher performance.
The company also clarifies that they have about three hundred developers working on the processors at the moment, with the idea of getting specific optimizations for this processor and performing properly in games. No data has been revealed on when these improvements will be active, but it may take some time, because the optimization process for a new architecture is slow and expensive, since you must first study and analyze it and later, develop for it, something that it may take about a year.
Amd is not in a position to give developers a ticket. But if you can give each developer a batch of 300 chips as a tip for their work, right?
Processors are to optimize games, as they would without a processor?
You did not understand, the developers are not going to want to optimize the games, that's why Amd has to bribe them and since they have no money they would have to pay them with microprocessors
You have to see that without a doubt you have no idea what you are talking about ... do you really think that a developer as such will do the job of optimizing software with the time and dedication that this implies for receiving a few processors as payment? Are you kidding me ?, It shows that you have no idea what you are talking about since no one would work for processors when what matters are the finances that optimization would mean for a large group of clients who could acquire the software from the universe of people who bought a Ryzen processor… A developer wouldn't even give a wink just to receive processors if there weren't the financial benefit of performing long or short term optimization…. And finally, if AMD wanted to give a nod to the developers to optimize only that, it would be if AMD pays for it but for some processors the developers would not lift a finger in optimizations. Developers know that optimizations should be done alone and because of the finances they might bring in from customers who purchase an AMD Ryzen processor, and those optimizations clearly translate into money over time. In short, optimization is in the interest of both AMD and software developers alike.
Dear, it seems to me that if you are joking
Don't bother, Renato Mendoza is dedicated only to trolling. Let him speak to himself, as if he will not exist. This is what happens when you read media for too long that all they want is to play the ball with AMD and they do not deign to inform, only to rally and salseo, and this happens, that neurons that you do not recover are fused. It doesn't deserve to be wasted on.
I would like to know what these supposed "problems" are. The truth is that I would like to see benchmarks that are a little more balanced and more multitasking. For example, to see how long it takes each one to encode 10 minutes of video with Premier or After Effects, render with CAD or ray tracing, things like that, because man does not live by gaming alone. And all that compared to the price of both the system and assembling a computer. That way, we would really see which is the best "quality/price"