Steam statistics on the graphics cards and processors most used in the platform, obviate the complicated moment for AMD and the urgency of releasing products that allow to gain market share against NVIDIA and Intel.
Currently Valve's Steam is the most important platform in the world and on the market, with thousands of players every day. Steam not only offers games, it has long offered multiple tools, such as video editing software, benchmark utilities and many other solutions. In addition, it is an interesting and useful measurement system to know which games are succeeding, which are the titles of the moment, there is a large community and it also serves to see which hardware is the most used in the platform as well as the operating system and other elements and We are going to stay with the graphics card market, specifically we want to know how much market NVIDIA and AMD have.
Well, analyzing the Steam gamer market, we can see that more than 64% of gamers use NVIDIA graphics, 21.5% use AMD graphics cards and we have been surprised by the low margin between AMD and Intel, since 15.65% of the market graphic is from Intel and the iGPUs that are integrated into the processors. This data is very interesting, but it has a clear explanation. AMD unfortunately, at the moment does not have high-end solutions that compete with NVIDIA and because of that niche many players escape, in what the AMD RX Vega arrives or not.
On the other hand, we have that AMD has not released an APU for almost two years, therefore it is another market niche with respect to Intel, in this case, it eludes it, indeed, it would also help to cut distances with NVIDIA. We are waiting for the arrival of the Raven Ridge APUs, which as we know will have Ryzen cores and Vega GPUs, something that may allow many users to opt for these APUs, if they offer good performance, especially for casual gamers, which is an important part of the Steam audience, above all, because it bets a lot on Indie titles.
We wanted to see which are the most used graphics currently and the GTX 5 Ti stands out in the Top 750, which leads the ranking, the GTX 970 and the GTX 1060, followed by the GTX 960 (I have this one) and the GTX 1070. We see which are graphs of two fairly recent generations. We have to go very low to find the first AMD graphic, specifically the HD 7700, a graphic that is already a few years old. Reviewing this first section we only see a graphics with a laptop name, such as the NVIDIA GT 720M and the GTX 1080 stands out, which has been gaining market share for five months and being ahead of the AMD graphics.
We have made the cut in the first AMD chart that is in the Steam database as the most used. We wanted to go further and look for more graphics, specifically the RX 480, since the RX 580 has only recently hit the market and there is no stock due to mining. We see that it is very, very low, it even has integrated Intel graphics on top, something quite curious. But as we have mentioned, NVIDIA has had a lot of free way in the mid and high range and AMD has brought two versions of Polaris that are not enough to compete with NVIDIA. Adding up the factors in which Vega never finishes reaching the market and the lack of new APUs, which would give AMD air.
We cannot ignore another data and it is the gamer market share in Steam, but in the processor part. We see that Intel has 80.22% market share, while AMD has 19.78%. If we look at the graph, we see how Intel in recent times has steadily gained market share, which denotes the bad times that AMD has lived until the arrival of Ryzen. It is possible that with the arrival of the Ryzen 3 and the Raven Ridge APUs, AMD will be able to overcome and cut market share from Intel, although it is difficult to say by what percentages. By the way, what a bad grape the e Valve to put AMD with the green color in the processor graphics.
Normal, AMD is now in the mining branch. Xdd
"By the way, what a bad grape for Valve to put AMD with the color green in the processor graphics."
The AMD logo sounds green to me, compared to the blue Intel logo;)
With PREY they launch it with AMD RYZEN of initial logo, brutal. And AMD has always had the RED or at least RADEON logo in games like Dirt.
In Darksiders 1 the original, not the remaster, the green logo appears for example there was a time when they used a green one in processors normally
https://www.profesionalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/AMD.jpg
http://www.silicon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/brands-logos-3d-amd-logo-hd-background-theme-1080x1920px-amd-technology-picture-amd-hd-wallpaper.jpg
http://leshcatlabs.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/AMD-%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8-Intel.jpg
http://purenintendo.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AMD.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-rJ7rGQ_MGps/TvMIoRNFOuI/AAAAAAAAACw/Hmf6T-OVm-Y/s1600/AMD+apu.jpg
http://hdqwalls.com/wallpapers/amd-brand-logo.jpg
Do those logos look red to you? If you are new, it is better not to comment on what you do not know
https://www.profesionalreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/AMD.jpg
http://www.silicon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/brands-logos-3d-amd-logo-hd-background-theme-1080x1920px-amd-technology-picture-amd-hd-wallpaper.jpg
http://leshcatlabs.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/AMD-%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B8-Intel.jpg
http://purenintendo.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AMD.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-rJ7rGQ_MGps/TvMIoRNFOuI/AAAAAAAAACw/Hmf6T-OVm-Y/s1600/AMD+apu.jpg
http://hdqwalls.com/wallpapers/amd-brand-logo.jpg
Do those logos look red to you? If you are new, it is better not to comment on what you do not know
To my knowledge, the color for AMD is red, blue for Intel, and green for NVIDIA.
It is that although the color of all life is red there was a time when they put a green logo on processors, look for the green logo in google, it is the rare AMD arrow that they turn green sometimes but come on in graphics and in the end in general they ended up being red despite their hint of change
Yes, but that was many years ago and always the color of AMD has been red.
Roberto you seem like a novice, AMD was always green, that since the FX and the Radeon have used the colors red and white does not mean that it has not been
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/AMDmarkham5.jpg/800px-AMDmarkham5.jpg
You mean these colors:
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1dffc181a863303e39b5ce2c6cbb32820cdfaec0c17208216e1a0f168e43abf3.jpg
the Zen CPU logo was initially green when it was renamed Ryzen they returned to red
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/62e5c8c49a09078e99c084ab9c7d37df590e5c84586b9fa3e0b8653fc3fbc172.jpg
It is that they have always pulled the green logo that they have when they want to be efficient and ecological and Zen represented efficiency and what the very word Zen implies, as it made it look very relaxing to see
and Yes, although I have seen it in more modern products
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/445db967b524b4fb270f4350dc72711bd9aadd4a58aeef75184374efb29282fd.jpg
Yes
The Amd Logo was always green, Instead the Ati Logo was White / Red. After Amd's purchase of Ati these colors changed.
Here I leave you how were the graphics with the Ati logo. Which in my opinion are missing as a brand.
http://www.vgamuseum.info/images/zaatharen/ati/X850XT_fhq.jpg
AMD does not miss gamers at the moment as miners are sweeping up all the available stock of the RX 400 and RX 500 series
It is that those who sell PC always use that 750ti crap they do not know another
Great bitch those shitty miners ... I've been wanting to buy the rx 480 for a while to build my pc, I think I'll opt for the gtx 1060
AMD has been worse in price, features and drivers, especially in GNU / Linux, it seems that they are improving, and that thanks to Vulkan (his invention) and its design different from NVIDIA's, they will recover the disadvantage lost in the next generation in terms of their utility for games.
My computer is "dying", some days it goes and others it doesn't, so I have configured a new one, and it turns out that by far, AM3+ with the FX-8350 and a 970 gigabyte gaming taking advantage of my DDR3 is the best platform in terms of quality / price at present, being by far the cheapest compared to Intel alternatives without counting the memory savings.
I would not be surprised to see Steam Machines at a console price in the near future with this configuration and a graph of about € 150 that plus 91 from the motherboard, 131 from the processor, 34 from the fan, 45 from the source, and 43 from the box would cost less than € 500, made by yourself, which I think could be lowered to 450, including 8 GB of RAM when sold integrated as Steam Machine.
I am more surprised by the people who are close to 40% who have 1GB of video, but in the network everyone talks about 4k and that they can use the xbox games. Eye I'm from PC I love to play I have a gtx 1060 6gb, but the reality is that the majority public does not have a "master race" pc (what a retarded word)
Well, the Polaris are out of stores, perhaps because people do other things with them than install "Steam". It also seems absurd to me seeing the performance of the R9 and Rx in games. Laughing, let's go. But hala…one more half-truth. (the worst of lies, they say :) )
The Polaris are sold out in stores due to mining and it is what saves AMD right now. Yes, the R9 and Rx are very good, but they heat up a lot and consume what is not in the writings, that's why there are so few people who choose to buy them. Half true for nothing, here we talk about Steam, you are the one who mixes other fields.
I opt for an rx580 but there is nowhere a people who get stressed leaves for nvidia