HardwareNews

AMD has less and less gamer community on Steam, while NVIDIA and Intel do not stop growing

Steam statistics on the graphics cards and processors most used in the platform, obviate the complicated moment for AMD and the urgency of releasing products that allow to gain market share against NVIDIA and Intel.

Currently Valve's Steam is the most important platform in the world and on the market, with thousands of players every day. Steam not only offers games, it has long offered multiple tools, such as video editing software, benchmark utilities and many other solutions. In addition, it is an interesting and useful measurement system to know which games are succeeding, which are the titles of the moment, there is a large community and it also serves to see which hardware is the most used in the platform as well as the operating system and other elements and We are going to stay with the graphics card market, specifically we want to know how much market NVIDIA and AMD have.

Well, analyzing the Steam gamer market, we can see that more than 64% of gamers use NVIDIA graphics, 21.5% use AMD graphics cards and we have been surprised by the low margin between AMD and Intel, since 15.65% of the market graphic is from Intel and the iGPUs that are integrated into the processors. This data is very interesting, but it has a clear explanation. AMD unfortunately, at the moment does not have high-end solutions that compete with NVIDIA and because of that niche many players escape, in what the AMD RX Vega arrives or not.

On the other hand, we have that AMD has not released an APU for almost two years, therefore it is another market niche with respect to Intel, in this case, it eludes it, indeed, it would also help to cut distances with NVIDIA. We are waiting for the arrival of the Raven Ridge APUs, which as we know will have Ryzen cores and Vega GPUs, something that may allow many users to opt for these APUs, if they offer good performance, especially for casual gamers, which is an important part of the Steam audience, above all, because it bets a lot on Indie titles.

We wanted to see which are the most used graphics currently and the GTX 5 Ti stands out in the Top 750, which leads the ranking, the GTX 970 and the GTX 1060, followed by the GTX 960 (I have this one) and the GTX 1070. We see which are graphs of two fairly recent generations. We have to go very low to find the first AMD graphic, specifically the HD 7700, a graphic that is already a few years old. Reviewing this first section we only see a graphics with a laptop name, such as the NVIDIA GT 720M and the GTX 1080 stands out, which has been gaining market share for five months and being ahead of the AMD graphics.

We have made the cut in the first AMD chart that is in the Steam database as the most used. We wanted to go further and look for more graphics, specifically the RX 480, since the RX 580 has only recently hit the market and there is no stock due to mining. We see that it is very, very low, it even has integrated Intel graphics on top, something quite curious. But as we have mentioned, NVIDIA has had a lot of free way in the mid and high range and AMD has brought two versions of Polaris that are not enough to compete with NVIDIA. Adding up the factors in which Vega never finishes reaching the market and the lack of new APUs, which would give AMD air.

We cannot ignore another data and it is the gamer market share in Steam, but in the processor part. We see that Intel has 80.22% market share, while AMD has 19.78%. If we look at the graph, we see how Intel in recent times has steadily gained market share, which denotes the bad times that AMD has lived until the arrival of Ryzen. It is possible that with the arrival of the Ryzen 3 and the Raven Ridge APUs, AMD will be able to overcome and cut market share from Intel, although it is difficult to say by what percentages. By the way, what a bad grape the e Valve to put AMD with the green color in the processor graphics.

Show more

Robert Sole

Director of Contents and Writing of this same website, technician in renewable energy generation systems and low voltage electrical technician. I work in front of a PC, in my free time I am in front of a PC and when I leave the house I am glued to the screen of my smartphone. Every morning when I wake up I walk across the Stargate to make some coffee and start watching YouTube videos. I once saw a dragon ... or was it a Dragonite?

Related publications

25 comments

  1. "By the way, what a bad grape for Valve to put AMD with the color green in the processor graphics."
    The AMD logo sounds green to me, compared to the blue Intel logo;)

    1. With PREY they launch it with AMD RYZEN of initial logo, brutal. And AMD has always had the RED or at least RADEON logo in games like Dirt.

      1. In Darksiders 1 the original, not the remaster, the green logo appears for example there was a time when they used a green one in processors normally

      1. It is that although the color of all life is red there was a time when they put a green logo on processors, look for the green logo in google, it is the rare AMD arrow that they turn green sometimes but come on in graphics and in the end in general they ended up being red despite their hint of change

          1. It is that they have always pulled the green logo that they have when they want to be efficient and ecological and Zen represented efficiency and what the very word Zen implies, as it made it look very relaxing to see

  2. AMD does not miss gamers at the moment as miners are sweeping up all the available stock of the RX 400 and RX 500 series

  3. Great bitch those shitty miners ... I've been wanting to buy the rx 480 for a while to build my pc, I think I'll opt for the gtx 1060

  4. AMD has been worse in price, features and drivers, especially in GNU / Linux, it seems that they are improving, and that thanks to Vulkan (his invention) and its design different from NVIDIA's, they will recover the disadvantage lost in the next generation in terms of their utility for games.

    My computer is "dying", some days it goes and others it doesn't, so I have configured a new one, and it turns out that by far, AM3+ with the FX-8350 and a 970 gigabyte gaming taking advantage of my DDR3 is the best platform in terms of quality / price at present, being by far the cheapest compared to Intel alternatives without counting the memory savings.

    I would not be surprised to see Steam Machines at a console price in the near future with this configuration and a graph of about € 150 that plus 91 from the motherboard, 131 from the processor, 34 from the fan, 45 from the source, and 43 from the box would cost less than € 500, made by yourself, which I think could be lowered to 450, including 8 GB of RAM when sold integrated as Steam Machine.

  5. I am more surprised by the people who are close to 40% who have 1GB of video, but in the network everyone talks about 4k and that they can use the xbox games. Eye I'm from PC I love to play I have a gtx 1060 6gb, but the reality is that the majority public does not have a "master race" pc (what a retarded word)

  6. Well, the Polaris are out of stores, perhaps because people do other things with them than install "Steam". It also seems absurd to me seeing the performance of the R9 and Rx in games. Laughing, let's go. But hala…one more half-truth. (the worst of lies, they say :) )

    1. The Polaris are sold out in stores due to mining and it is what saves AMD right now. Yes, the R9 and Rx are very good, but they heat up a lot and consume what is not in the writings, that's why there are so few people who choose to buy them. Half true for nothing, here we talk about Steam, you are the one who mixes other fields.

Leave your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Button back to top
Close

Ad blocker detected

This site is financed through the use of advertising, we always ensure that it is not too intrusive for the reader and we prioritize the reader's experience on the web. But if you block ads, some of our funding will be reduced.