New benchmarks of the AMD Ryzen 5 1400, compared in this case with the Intel i5 7400 and Intel Pentium G4560 processors, positioning the AMD processor as a good solution.
The leaks around the ADM Ryzen 5 processors do not stop and the last data that has been given is the Ryzen 5 1400 processor. This processor has four cores and eight processing threads and has a frequency of 3.2GHz and a Boost mode of 3.4Ghz and that it would be at the height in theory of the Intel i5 7400 processor. We suppose that the performance will be polishing as the new BIOSes come out, it is more expected that when these processors arrive on the 11th of this month, they will have quality BIOS that allow excellent performance.
The video also compares it to the Intel Pentium G4560 processor, which has two cores and four processing threads, a frequency of 3.5GHz and a TDP of 54W. Yes it is true that the performance is clearly inferior, but this Intel processor has a really very interesting price and which we have been able to analyze in a team that Coolmod gave us, offering a much better performance than expected and more taking into account Note that it is a processor that does not have a Boost mode.
Both the i5 7400 and the Ryzen 5 1400 have quite similar TDP and frequencies, although the Intel processor only has four cores and four processing threads, while the AMD processor has four more processing threads than the processor. Intel, which should give you extra performance. For this comparison, the AMD processor has been installed in an ASRock Fatal1ty Gaming AB350 K4 and DDR4 @ 2666MHz memory, all under Windows 10 x64.
List of benchmarks in the video and the minute:
- OCing at 00:16
- Specs at 00:41
- Battlefield 1 DX12 at 01:18
- Fallout 4 at 04:03
- GTA 5 at 04:51
- Hitman DX12 at 06:49
- Just Cause 3 at 07:39
- Assassin's Creed Unity at 08:06
- The Witcher 3 at 08:57
- Rise Of The Tomb Raider DX12 at 10:02
lol when AMD doesn't tell stores when to sell it
It has caught my attention that the use of cpu in Intel i5 is much higher than in the amd, I suppose that the games have yet to adapt to the possibilities of the ryzen
The reality is that the i5 works at 90% compared to 60 or 70% of the R5, the Ryzen should show their capacity well.
obvious lack of optimization!
Well, let's see, for me these benchmarks don't make sense, because it's like comparing the performance of a 480 without drivers against a GTX 1060 with updated drivers. Obviously, if the games don't support Ryzen, they will have a much lower performance than they should, otherwise look at AOTS. But obviously, it helps us to know its "minimum" performance.
I think it is evident when seeing the% utilization of the CPUs and even seeing in some tests the Lentium so close to the other two, that they are not games that use many threads (in which the difference is more closed) that it is necessary a lot of optimization to use the ZEN architecture well that in my opinion is wasted around 30% compared to the competition!
It will even take a couple of months for even motherboards to use the cpu well since even the motherboard manufacturers did not know how Ryzen was going to work.
Of course ... there will be a need to wait and for both the Soft and the Hard to mature !! (especially in a second iteration)