Gaijin Entertainment CEO says Xbox One X GPU is superior to NVIDIA GTX 1080 and NVIDIA Titan X
Anton Yudintsev, CEO of Gaijin Entertainment, has dared to say that the GPU of the Xbox One X is between the NVIDIA GTX 1080 and the NVIDIA Titan X, in terms of performance and power.
I usually watch the La Vida Moderna program every day on YouTube and inside there is a section that makes Queque, one of the three comedians at the table, has a section called 'people who freak out'. Today I take over this section since the members of the Democratic Dictatorial Republic of Moderdonia have the right to do what we want in pursuit of the 'commedia'. All this introduction to comment that the CEO of Gaijin Entertainment, Anton Yudintsev has been blown away and said that the graphics power of the Xbox One X is on a par with the NVIDIA GTX 1080 and even the NVIDIA Titan X.
Gaijin Entertainment has developed games like X-Bales and IL-2 Sturmovik, though its most well-known title is War Thunder. During an interview, Anton got a little carried away, telling GamingBolt that the Xbox One X's graphics power is similar to that of the most powerful graphics cards on the market—a ridiculous claim, considering that the Xbox One X's GPU is based on the Polaris architecture, which at most reaches the level of the GTX 1060.
"First of all, console developers have better access to hardware due to a very thin API layer, and they can make better and faster code for the exact hardware (for a particular console)."
Obviously it would be more correct to compare it to one of AMD's GPUs (since Xbox One X actually uses an AMD GPU), but NVIDIA currently dominates the PC market. So I would say that the computing power of the Xbox One X GPU is comparable to a GeForce GTX 1080, however the amount of GDDR5 memory and its bandwidth, which is very important for current games (since many of them are limited by memory speed) makes it something like the Titan X series. "
AMD, the company that has developed the RX Vega, a graphics card capable of causing a blackout to the entire street, has said that the graphics they have adjusted for the Xbox One X is between the GTX 1080 and the Titan X, therefore , this graphics card would be above the AMD RX Vega 64 and would perform the same as the GTX 1080 Ti, therefore we believe that AMD should launch a graphics card with the same GPU that they have implemented in the Microsoft console.
The best proof of all is that the Xbox One X has many problems to move the Playerunknown's Battlegrounds smoothly, being so so that it is not able to maintain the 30FPS in a stable way, except if we are fooling around with the jeep on the map , because at the moment there is a bit of crowding, the FPS drops to 15FPS hopefully and when it comes to opening doors, it drops to 5FPS. People who are freaking out.
These people from Antiguonia ...
What a lack of reasoning and criteria for desktop consoles, I'm not going to write too much, I'm just going to give some examples and apply a little logic, Xbox One X is a game console, therefore being a closed system, developers can optimize games to the maximum to get the most out of the hardware, it is not the same as on a PC, because simply the 6 TFLOPS of graphic power of the One X can be used to the maximum and take advantage of very high levels, that's why it's not worth comparing the most equivalent graphics card in power on the market because it would quickly be left behind despite having similar power since I repeat: developers can make better use of the hardware of the consoles, I invite you to take a look for example at Gears of War: Judgment, an exclusive game for the Xbox 360 console, now answer me, can you build a PC with 512MB of RAM and three cores that is capable of running that game at a perfect 30fps and a graphic quality of that caliber? Of course not. It's because that limited hardware (at this point) has been used to its full potential. Now, what's happening with PUBG? To begin with, the game on Xbox One is in early access, so what are you talking about? It's an incomplete game, full of bugs and zero optimization. Why are you using an incomplete game as "proof" of a console's poor performance? Why don't we take Forza Motorsport 7 as an example? A complete game prepared for Xbox One and Xbox One X and that runs at 60fps in high or even ultra quality, because you like to attack video consoles for being a PC fanboy, also the PCs used in the video comparisons are computers of more than 900 dollars even more than 1.000 against video consoles that their price is around 200 and 500 dollars, with simple reasoning and logic we can reach a very different conclusion from yours that responds to that of a fanatic, if the Xbox One X hardware is fully exploited we can have (as has been proven) Triple A games in 4K resolution and very possibly at 60fps in altra-ultra quality and thus respond to the performance of a GTX 1070 and why not? That of a GTX 1080 most likely, but as always that is a matter of the developers, the hardware of the machine does not condition you, greetings and stop misinforming, fanatic.
These crazy gaijin Russians don't have a clue what they're talking about