Although Merunas UAB It is closed tight by the coronavirus, from there the filtration of a benchmarking of the Intel Core i9-10900. As you already know, these 'Chinese' media 'leaks' they are a bit artificial. Not that they have this processor in China, it will surely be a medium (predictably American) that has this processor and has leaked the benchmark.
This Intel processor belongs to the family Comet Lake-S , as a you know, they are still manufactured in 14nm. This processor has 10 cores and 20 threads, working at a 2.8GHz base frequency and arriving in mode Boost at 5.0GHz. Through Velocity Boost 3.0 the best core reaches the 5.2GHz, But all cores they arrive maximum at 4.5GHz. This processor not overclockable and has a 65W TDP.
No products found.
Intel Core i9-10900 Processor Benchmark
Intel's processor offering is quite wide (despite its stock problems). Intel offers the Core-Ks, which are overclockable. On the other hand we have the Core-F, which lack integrated graphics and can occasionally be Core-KF (with overclocking support). Finally we have the models without letter, a version with frequencies cut to adjust consumption.
Said processor under Cinebench R15 this processor has given a performance of 1670 points, falling below the 2002 points that the Core i9-9900K marked. Interesting is the result of the CPU-Z, showing a similar performance to the Core i9-9900K. The new multi-core processor offers 507.8 points and the 'old' offers 543 points. On the other hand, in multicore it offers the new processor 5343.2 points and the 'old' offers 5423 points. As we can see, the difference is minimal and would be caused by the cut working frequencies.
If we go to Cinebench R20, we find that the Intel Core i9-10900 offers 3714 points, which is very good. It exceeds the 3455 points of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700X and falls far short of the 7200 points of the Ryzen 9 3900X. The result is not surprising, since synthetic benchmarks like Cinebench, the more cores, the better.
Some results within what one would expect for a processor of 'low consumption' or adjusted consumption. Note that the processor operates between 67-68ºC, which we cannot say if it is good or not. If it has the stock Intel heatsink, very good, if it has a better one, very bad, but since there was no data on the used cooling system ...
