The 7th generation of Intel Core i9700 14K processors will be based on the XNUMXnm
Intel's change of plans, since they have just announced at a conference that the 7th generation Intel Core i9700 14K will be based on 10nm, since XNUMXnm, they are still a bit green.
Intel's problems with 10nm are not a secret, but be careful, because these problems are not isolated, since GlobalFoundries and TSMC are already beginning to say that they still do not meet the expected deadlines. During a conference by the President of the Technology, Systems Architecture and Clients Group, Dr Venkata Renduchintala, at the JP Morgan offices, spoke about the company's situation with 10nm lithography and that it is practically certain that the Core i7 9700K will still be based on 14nm.
Intel will continue with 14nm in the XNUMXth generation of processors
We must travel to 2014, when the company introduced the Broadwell, the first processors in 14nm and since then the Skylake, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake have arrived and now it will be the Whiskey Lake, all of them in 14nm, but they have been refined and the Coffee Lake already implement six cores. The problem is that making the jump to 10nm is a problem, because the production is below expectations.
Intel did not plan so many problems for the 10nm and this will surely translate into problems in the 5nm of GlobalFoundries and TSMC, what's more, they have already said that they may not arrive for 2020 and they would be beginning to delay them, at least two years. Although the production of 10nm chips is approximately 50% per wafer, the company will commercialize the Core M3 8114Y and the Core i3 8121U, two low-power processors and the latter is expected to be integrated into Lenovo laptops that will only be available in China.
So, 14nm will remain with us, at least, until mid-2019, since if during Q1 2019, the company achieves a good production of processors in 10nm, it will not be until the second half, when they are commercialized, at the earliest. Possibly the Core i7 9700K and their little brothers, will be compatible with Coffee Lake motherboards, but not with Kaby Lake. No big improvements are expected.
Source: OC3D
Amd is going to slap you when you get the process out at 7nm.
The truth is that the current 12nm technology doesn't surpass Intel's 14nm. The same will happen with Intel's 10nm. AMD's 7nm won't surpass them. A clear example of this is that with more cores and more processing threads, they haven't managed to completely surpass them. And there's still a lot to see this year. So, be careful, this is just the beginning.
The 10 nm of intel and Globalfoundries are almost similar, those of intel are actually 9.5nm and those of globalfoudries and tsmc are 9.2 nm, they are not 10 nm or 7 nm that is pure marketing, and if those of GF and tsmc are higher by Little, the same thing happened with the 14 nm of intel and amd in amd they were 17 nm and in intel they were always 13 nm and even with that difference amd was on the heels of intel and now with the 12 the difference is a hair, There to be realistic and better informed with things and not be so FANBOY. An i7 8700k user tells you
My friend. Now I am shocked. Xdxdxd
the ipc of intel and ryzen is almost the same except that intel has polished the GHz issue for so many generations that's why it has beastly turbos, it is the best processor for games seconded by the 8600k, we would all like to have that beast, while amd is just in the first generation and optimized ryzen + does not reach more than 4,2ghz beyond that the voltages get out of control even if you raise it 25 MHz, now try the vegas an intel 8700k with six cores 12 threads with turbo to 4,7ghz vs a ryzen 5 2600x with 6 cores 12 threads turbo to 4,2ghz who wins check it out on guru3d
not to mention a game where everything is Intel, even optimized, let's say work, now in Vegas a few years ago an Intel gave a higher score than AMD, unlike Power Director, which always gives better performance in AMD, yesterday and now.
now vegas 2600x vs 8700k less seconds is better
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ae84fbff0e19d2360247dd676fa31ccdba533b097ee56d775a1c9d7f4463fafd.jpg
in video editing you see the use of the cores clear less seconds is better
I'm a user of a 6700k for gaming and a Ryzen 1700x for work. I'm not a fanboy, I just criticize the fanboys of both brands.
There is fear huh ?!
«…but be careful, because these problems are not isolated, since GlobalFoundries and TSMC…»
Go fabric, in fucking life you can only speak ill of intel.
Excuse me, were you saying?: https://hardwaresfera.com/noticias/opinion-noticias/intel-el-ridiculo-de-los-10nm-se-suma-al-ridiculo-de-las-tarjetas-graficas-y-optane/
TSMC and GlobalFoundries have already said that they will have problems with 5nm, in fact, they are already having them.
Look, I sweat it. You always throw the puyita to the others ...
2019 sounds to me like the new amd athlon as it was at the time, I hope that this competition intel vs amd remains so the user benefits with price quality, It is time for the 8 cores as well as the 4k to be standard