New mess in Apple's orbit, in this case due to the OLED screens of the iPhone X, which in the long term could show part of an image on the screen that is no longer there due to a defect in the screens.

The iPhone X has now officially reached the market, Apple's first terminal without frames and with an OLED screen, a technology that, among other things, stands out for its high quality of contrast and saturation, but is also characterized by wearing out with the weather. The company wants that users who buy this overrated terminal could suffer in the future image persistence, so the company with the bitten apple has improved its support page to explain how the OLED screen of this new terminal works. .

The company explains that 'the slight changes in color and tone' that occur when we look at the screen at an angle, are perfectly normal. They also highlight that OLED screens present slight visual changes after use and after a long period of time, such as showing a residual part of a high contrast image, which could be seen for long periods of time, even when in We already have another image on the screen or directly, we are on the terminal desktop.

It is not something new to the iPhone X, this also happens in the Google Pixel 2 XL with Android Oreo operating system. Apple wants to anticipate the criticism and thus solve the complaints of the users and possibly, I will pass the guarantee for the lining. In the case of Google, the problem appeared earlier than expected, according to some reports, since this problem appeared just a week after having the terminal in hand, something that makes it clear that OLED technology for smartphones is very green.

Apple ensures that the screens are perfect and that they will not have these problems in a short period of time. In addition, it has been added that 'the design of the Super Retina display to be the best in the industry in the resolution of burning the OLED'. The OLED screens on the iPhone X are also made by Samsung, as are those on the Pixel 2 XL, so the problems could be replicated. The question is obvious, why are technologies used that do not work correctly in terminals that are worth a damn?

Source: engadget