First benchmark of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 processor, the processor that was distributed yesterday to some lucky users and the first data is really brutal.
Yesterday we echoed that some users already had in their hands the first AMD Ryzen 5 1600 processors, which they had bought in a store and had received it. Logically this led to the appearance in a few days of the first benchmarks of this processor. Well, just twenty-four hours after the first images of an AMD Ryzen 5 1600 processor, we already have the first benchmarks of, apparently, this same processor, due to the data that has been shown about it.
A Chinese user has uploaded the first performance screenshots of this processor. We must bear in mind that the name is covered, but despite everything, due to the working frequencies, consumption and the number of cores, which would be six cores and twelve processing threads, we are certainly talking about an AMD Ryzen 5 1600, what That we do not know is because the name appears covered, if we really already know that this processor has reached less than a few lucky people.
The data shows a processor out of series, capable of destroying any Intel processor that is put in front of it. The reality is that it would not matter if it was slightly below the vast majority of Intel Skylake or Kaby Lake processors, because for price it would eat them, for sure. The data from Battlefield 1 or Rises of the Tomb Raider together with an NVIDIA GTX 1080, make it clear that they are very good processors, even better than the AMD Ryzen 7, which are great processors, but these for price, are a better option for gaming.
We must highlight an important aspect of these six-core processors. The eight-core processors are two quad-core processors embedded in the same DIE and that communicate using a special protocol. Six-core ones are eight-core processors with one or two faulty cores, which are disabled and the processor remains perfectly functional. This is due to a specific deficiency in the manufacturing process or a problem in the assembly, something perfectly normal and that Intel also commercialized, everything is said. They are renamed and voila.
Source: baidu
I do not see anything clear !!! ... it is seen in the upper parts of a very diverse handful of intel processors of different generations and characteristics! ... and ???
It should not be taken as something safe and reliable, it is only a beta, a first information that points to large processors. We will bring you as always, the most complete review possible and there we will explain how it performs.
Sounds good to me ... since the results shown are somewhat scattered!
Why are they uneven? Give details, since that way it gives for a long discussion
No... uneven, no! I said scattered, meaning I see a wide variety of tests and CPUs of different cores and generations, which is fine, but it leaves a very broad panorama with room for conjecture and does not focus on one or two areas in particular, such as gaming, which has been greatly exploited as it is apparently the greatest area of opportunity for AMD.
if the images are true, ave maria MOTHER COUNTRY, intel is in serious trouble.
No time to buy um, long live AMD xD
Honestly from what I see in the results, price / performance ... it's A GOOD PROCESSOR ..., I was thinking of buying an i7 3770k for my h61h2-m12 but I think it's time for that better Ryzen.
I have the 16 threads 8 cores, brutal, along with a GIgabyte x370 5 of 215 euros and an NVMe you are amazed!