The unknown AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processor appears by surprise, which has sixteen cores and thirty-two processing threads working at a frequency of 3.39GHz in the Geekbench 4 database.
Today we were surprised by the leak of an AMD Ryzen Threadripper processor, which, as you can see in the table at the end of the news, was not planned. This unknown processor that has appeared six times in the last few hours in the Geekbench 4 database is the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, a processor that is not in the list and that has sixteen cores and thirty-two processing threads, working at a frequency of 3.39GHz, which we assume is the base frequency.
It is not, as we said, among the planned processors, since in theory the processor that should have 16 cores is the Ryzen Threadripper 1998 / 1998X, not this unknown 1950X, which has surprised us. Everything indicates that it is real, because it has been mounted on an ASRock X399 Professional Gaming and in the benchmark it appears up to six times with six different results. According to Geekbench 4 this obtains a score that goes from 3917 points to 4216 points in a single core, while in multiple cores it goes from 24210 points to 24816 points.
The difference in scores is the usual one in all these cases, since as we know, if we carry out several benchmarks to the same product, each time it will give us a different result, since many factors influence. We want to highlight that in addition, on this processor, there is a result that we have not found when performing the search, where this processor would mark 4167 points in a single core and 24539 points in all cores. It may be that it has been erased from the central base, something quite rare, everything is said, but the processor can be found.
Right now we are in a sea of doubts, because this processor has broken all the schemes we had, as you can see in the table at the end. The name of Threadripper 1950X, would indicate that the names given so far are wrong and it is likely that this processor has a model above, with who knows, if more cores or perhaps more frequency. The truth is that it has left us misplaced. If you want to see the data, here we leave you the search link that we have made.
The PCI-E lines that show in your table is not bad? There were not 64 PCI-E lines that the threadripper was going to bring.
44 lines are exclusive for graphics, that's what we refer to.
Np, for the graphics there are 64 lines to be able to connect 4 x16 GPUs each, the opposite of Intel where you can only connect 4 x8 GPUs since 44 PCI-E lines are not enough.
You forget the 24 lines that the chipset offers, nobody counts them and they are there. That of 4 GPU with 16 lines, we'll see, because I can't see it clearly.
These lines cannot be used if the processor does not support them unless a separate controller is implemented as was done in the z270 in the top of the range models so that 4 video cards can be used.
Technically I would swear that this is 64 PCIe Lanes, of which 44 are optimized for graphics
Intel cries
We'll see if he cries or laughs, for now, it's all there.