Australia investigates the company's submersible smartphones for not working well underwater

Australia has launched an investigation into possible fraudulent advertising of Samsung's underwater smartphones.

Users are increasingly demanding more from smartphones , seeking differentiating features that offer extra benefits. Samsung is one of the leading brands in the market and has a large number of water-resistant devices. Despite this, the company in Australia seems to be experiencing significant difficulties in this area. The problem lies in the fact that the company's advertising is unconvincing, as it is quite far removed from reality.

The problem is so serious and there are so many complaints that even the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission investigates it. Specifically, the ads show how certain terminals can be used underwater. The problem is that users report problems when they try to imitate Samsung's ads.

samsung smartphone submersible

Samsung in trouble for its waterproof terminals

Specifically, the Commission is investigating no less than 300 Samsung advertisements. The South Korean company is accused of providing false or information that does not correspond to reality. Mainly the complaints come from its use in the sea or in swimming pools. Although the ads show images using the terminals in these locations, the reality is that they do not work properly.

Many users report problems when using them to take snapshots at sea. Some consumers have even reported that Samsung terminals have suffered breakdowns. And furthermore, the company is refusing to repair these terminals. They hide in that it is not in the guarantee of the terminal.

It is not the first time that smartphone manufacturers do this nasty. Although they advertise their terminals as waterproof, if they are damaged by using them in water, they wash their hands. This is why the company has received lawsuits in several countries that it has lost.

At the moment we do not have any evidence that Samsung has said anything about it. It is possible that when this is known more users begin to complain about the deficiencies of the terminal. In the end, overpaying for a waterproof smartphone is becoming pointless. We can practically say that users are scammed and then if something happens, buy another of our terminals, because we do not cover the breakdown.

Source: MSPU

Exit mobile version