Michael Pachter claims that users who pay for loot boxes are idiots

The last of Michael Pachter has been to attack users, saying they are stupid, for spending money on loot boxes or loot boxes.

Within the video game industry, there are many opportunists and quite a few 'experts', who take advantage of the media speaker and in some cases, have been in the industry for quite some time. One of these specialists, especially in blundering, is Michael Pachter, who is known in the industry not for his successes, precisely. This character is quite controversial and usually charges against everything and everyone who gets ahead, no matter what else.

Pachter says that loot-boxes are the fault of stupid users.

This is the latest genius from Pachter, who has blamed users for loot boxes, which are more than common, within the video game industry. Pachter directly accuses users, since according to this analyst, loot boxes have their origin in the fact that 'users are stupid' and allow this type of practice. He emphasizes that there are many who spend thousands of dollars, until they find the desired object.

His reflection is so deep that it highlights that large companies earn millions thanks to these micropayments. You don't have to be a lynx about this either. It stands out that it is a way to bleed the pocket of users, constantly, causing them to spend a lot of money, instead of dropping everything at once.

Loot boxes are extremely common in the video game market, what's more, it is difficult to find a game without loot boxes. What this system does is offer you a box where there may be certain objects, you pay to open it and you get what you get, no more. If you want something specific and it is of high difficulty, you will have to open many boxes to get it.

The Netherlands and Belgium were the first countries to ban loot boxes in video games, as they incite gambling and have been considered gambling. Gambling, being illegal for those under 18 years of age in most countries, forces developers to block this content or withdraw the game from the market.

Anyway, what matters is that Pachter has once again charged someone, in this case against the users. He has ceased to be a reputed analyst to a carnival monkey who only attacks and criticizes.